Friday, November 18, 2011

Google 201x =? Microsoft 199x

Long long ago in a galaxy far far away... It was a different time then. It was thought to be the up and coming underdog. It was the proponent of open systems and no one thought of it as evil, yet. That was Microsoft. At that time, Microsoft was a much smaller player compared to the much larger Apple Computer. Funny how history repeats itself.

Microsoft had one trick that it played over and over. Licensing its software to hardware makers, not selling directly to consumers. Shrink-wrapped Windows sales are excessively low for an OS that dominates +90% of the market. The majority of Windows users get it pre-bundled with their hardware, very few consciously choose Windows. In many ways, Windows chooses the user and not the other way around.

Just like Microsoft, Google is a one-trick pony. Microsoft has Windows and Office. Google has its ad business and search. Both use their monopoly in one market to dominate another. Just like Microsoft, Google exists to stifle innovation. If it were any other company, Android would have bankrupted it, just as the XBox or Zune or Bing would have bankrupted Microsoft. Google is using its ad revenue to undercut other companies and kill them, the same way Microsoft uses its Windows and Office money to subsidize its failures just to get into a market, undercut them by offering a lesser quality product for near-free and crush their competitor and create yet another monopoly. That's exactly what Google is doing with Android. Google earns nothing from Android, they give it away to destroy others. The OEMs won't develop their own OS since they can get Android for free and those who dare to go against Google's will and develop their own will find themselves locked out of the market, unable to compete. By offering their lesser quality OS for near-free, they will kill all the good quality OSes that exist or might emerge. This was Google's goal.

Unfortunately for Google this isn't working as good as they hoped. Microsoft is collecting royalties on Android, rendering Android costly for hardware vendors. Also companies like Baidu and Amazon are using Android to compete against Google and cutting Google off of any profits that they might make. Android might stifle innovation as Google intended but it will also compete against itself, leaving Google with an expensive endeavor that can never be truly monetized and if we are lucky Google will slowly distance itself away from it.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Put a Fork in it


Flurry: Is it Game Over for Nintendo DS and Sony PSP?

Flash on Mobile is Dead

To all the Adobe shills and the Android retards where is your Flash now?


Steve Jobs famously opposed allowing Flash on iOS and wrote Thoughts on Flash to explain the position taken by Apple, which any sane person that desires an open web would share. It was only a matter of time before Flash dies but at one moment when scumbag Google endorse Flash in an unethical matter typical of a drug pusher, it seemed as if Flash would be forced upon the web for many years to come. Now however it is officially dead on mobile devices.


I applaud Microsoft for helping to kill Flash. Flash was dying but Microsoft's decision not to allow it on WP7 and W8MUI pretty much delivered the final blow.
Microsoft could have been a bunch of scumbags like Google and tried to push Flash but for once they did the honorable thing and copied Apple's position.

Thank you Microsoft.